“These new levels are below levels that can be reliably detected using existing EPA methods.” Rather than wait for the outcome of this peer review, EPA has announced new Advisories that are 3,000 to 17,000 times lower than those released by the Obama Administration in 2016,” according to an ACC statement released on June 30. “The Agency’s revised LHAs for PFOA and PFOS are based on toxicity assessments that are currently being reviewed by EPA’s Science Advisory Board. The ACC claims that even though the new guidelines outline “non-regulatory levels,” the EPA’s Lifetime Health Advisories (LHAs) will have sweeping policy implications at the state and federal level, and claim the agency failed to follow its own scientific practices. Chemical and fire safety equipment manufacturers also face hundreds of lawsuits brought by former firefighters who developed testicular cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and other injuries after direct exposure to the chemicals in firefighting foam. The move comes amid concerns raised in a growing number of PFAS water contamination lawsuits now being filed by individuals diagnosed with cancer or ulcerative colitis after drinking water known to contain high levels of the chemicals. 004 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and 0.02 ppt for PFOS. In response, the agency has set a health advisory level of. The EPA made the decision after its own researchers determined “negative health effects” could occur with concentrations in water at or near zero, and below the EPA’s ability to detect at this time. In June, the EPA set new PFAS drinking water advisory levels for four PFAS chemicals, including PFOA and PFOS. PFOA and PFOS are two of the most studied, and two of the most toxic, of the family of chemicals known as PFAS. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on July 29, indicating that the EPA’s issuance of new lifetime health advisory levels for the PFAS chemicals known as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), was “scientifically flawed.” The American Chemistry Council (ACC) filed a petition for review (PDF) in the U.S. However, there are increasing concerns about unsafe levels of PFAS in drinking water, much of which has come from use of the chemicals in firefighting foam commonly used on military bases, airports and fire training facilities. Toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals” since they are known to persist in the environment and build up in the human body, have been used in a variety of consumer products and packaging in recent years. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in an effort to reverse a decision that lowers the safe levels of PFAS chemicals in water before a health advisory is issued. A lobbying group for the chemicals industry has filed a lawsuit against the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |